Sullivan: Hillary not so bad after all

Andrew Sullivan expects "push-back" on his column suggesting an Obama-Clinton ticket. And well he should. He's spent months telling his readers about Clinton's utter depravity, her lack of any worthwhile claim to the presidency, her representation of the worst and vilest in our politics. I won't bother to link to any of his past posts that are along these lines; they're easily enough found. But now it's O.K. for her to be vice-president? The real question is, which should not be taken seriously--Sullivan's past screeds, his current stance, or both? I suggest "both."