data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8bf9/f8bf9cebed0ef3ac9311bc282704efefd4e1778c" alt=""
Only 6 percent of the scientists surveyed were Republicans? If that's reflective of scientists overall, it's a problem for Republicans. But it's also a lost opportunity when you consider that on some issues, Republican views match scientists' preferences pretty well. Consider this table:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2c4a/b2c4a1e07e4d9c3aae4c555b9a0564e35122c744" alt=""
If Republicans talked more about nuclear power, particularly as being part of the mix needed to address the possible consequences of the Earth getting warmer, it would be a lot harder to characterize Republicans as the know-nothing party on science. Throw space solar power and algae biodiesel into the mix, and you have the beginnings of a pro-science Republican energy policy.
UPDATE 7/15: I've got a good deal more on this here.