At
Scientific American, my friend
Robin Lloyd has a good summary of an emerging (and confusing) controversy over whether deforestation might actually mitigate global warming as discussed in the forthcoming
SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance.

For all I know, Levitt and Dubner have a point, but I've become a little more skeptical of them since I
reviewed the first
Freakonomics; it's odd that so many of their findings are hot-button counterintuitive things that help sell books.
UPDATE: More from
Stand-Up Economist.
UPDATE 11-3: Quite a bit more from
Ronald Bailey.
No comments:
Post a Comment